A video abstract of our paper in IMR, taking the perspective of someone living in the country… (I could have done this from the perspective of the “migrant”).
(and yes, I know that there is more to transnationalism than moving to another country)
Zufferey, J., Steiner, I. and Ruedin, D. 2021. ‘The many forms of multiple migrations: Evidence from a sequence analysis in Switzerland, 1998 to 2008’. International Migration Review. DOI55(1):254-279. DOI:10.1177/0197918320914239
Our publication on hiring discrimination against Blacks in Switzerland is now properly published at JEMS. Using a correspondence test, we find the unfortunately usual pattern of discrimination in Switzerland, too.
Admissions are open until 30 April 2022, wide choice of courses, friendly atmosphere… and if you’re into migration, mobility, refugees, we’ve really got you covered with the MA in Migration and Citizenship — including options to study abroad. Come join us!
Reading up on decolonizing sociology — and other disciplines of the social sciences — I often come across the objection that it “would not make sense to have an African/Asian (etc.) physics”.
This objection implicitly focuses on human universals, and often is rejected on the grounds that the context is different — arguing for unique interactions between context and human universals. Thinking about this a bit, it struck me that we don’t have to argue for (potentially) unique interactions or different contexts — even if they most probably exist: an African/Asian (etc.) physics actually is not problematic as implied by the objection! Why? Because local physics would identify the same regularities! It might not be efficient to build parallel systems, but in terms of discovery it wouldn’t be as bad as normally implied.