The one book you need for academic writing

There are many books out there for PhD students and other academics seeking to improve their writing. My current favourite is ‘The Writing Workshop‘ by Barbara Sarnecka. It’s got everything, and you can even get a free copy from OSF.

Why this one rather than other books? I think it’s got the balance right, some 350 pages to cover everything. You’ll find the old classics like write often, structure your writing, get together to do some writing, but the book doesn’t stop there.

Don’t me mislead by the title, this is a book about writing; the workshop is in the title because this is how the book started. Yes, social accountability can be a great help for many, and planning (development plans, term plans) can be great. But the book really comes to life in the third chapter, where we learn about mining and gardening. Writing as mining regards ideas as resources that are forcibly extracted. You work harder, you extract more resources, and you extract those resources before your competitors. That’s a common mindset in academia, and also how many books on academic writing (that I know) seem to approach writing. Sarnecka proposes writing as gardening: weeding and pruning, watering the plants. We harvest the fruits of this garden. I think this is the right mindset to work in academia, and oddly enough, the mindset that probably allows you to write more and better papers.

The chapters on literature reviews and the IMRaD (introduction, methods, results, and discussion) structure of scientific papers are excellent, because they explain the whole business of academic writing. By providing the bigger picture, some academic conventions start to make sense. I really wish I had this spelled out so explicitly when I did my doctoral research. The book is really hands-on, with explicit examples, like how to write differently for different audiences, or why figures beat tables hands down. Sure, we all know this in principle, but this book actually shows what this means!

There’s a chapter on academic presentations (and posters), which gets to the point, like every chapter in the book. We get clear guidelines, an explanation why these guidelines make sense, and examples to show how this works in practice. We’ve probably all heard about the importance of telling stories or making slides accessible — this book shows you how. At the same time, it’s far from a simple (prescriptive) formula: there’s still room for you and your tastes.

We also get chapters on structuring paragraphs, sentences, and words. As everywhere, we get the why along with the how and plenty of examples to illustrate what is said.

I ordered print copies for the PhD students starting with us this autumn.

Sarnecka, Barbara W. 2021. The Writing Workshop: Write More, Write Better, Be Happier in Academia. OSF Preprints.

Could not connect to SciFlow

In the past few days, I could not log into SciFlow:

Something went wrong.
No session found

Please try again. If the problem persist, please reach out to

Well, I did contact the excellent customer service, and it turns out that they tweaked their cookie settings. Which simply means: clear out your SciFlow cookies, and keep writing!

AS Checklist for Articles

Here’s a quite helpful checklist for research articles from the Academy of Sociology.

I guess ‘checklist’ is the wrong way to describe it; it’s more like a list of desiderata for good research articles to be considered before starting to write. I mean who’s going to go through 11 pages before submitting an article?

The points are quite helpful, but they are only starting points — follow the links and do your own research on the topics.


The reviewer raises an important point…

It’s common practice to respond to reviewer comments with the phrase “The reviewer raises an important point”, I’ve seen it recommended on many occasions. Today, I had this following gem:

Me (aka reviewer 1): Major point ….

Response: The reviewer raises an important point …

Didn’t I just say so?

Academic writing: the one book you really need

There is no shortage of books on academic writing. If you cannot decide where to start, in my view, you should start with “Write No Matter What” by Joli Jensen. Here’s why:

  • it’s relatively short
  • it summarizes the best advice out there
  • it’s realistic

Like other books on academic writing, it starts by addressing common myths about academic writing. I find it painful to see these myths repeated in my own environment. In Jensen’s book, you’ll learn three taming techniques (creating a project box, using a ventilation file, and writing at least 15 minutes every day). So we’re looking at being organized, being realistic (i.e. having room for frustration, writing blocks, etc.), and that important continuing contact with the writing project.

Compared to other similar books I know, I really liked how “Write No Matter What” does not imply that if only you were more disciplined, you’d get all that writing done. No, instead there is an entire section on maintaining momentum, lost trails, and handling revisions and rejections. Getting stalled? There’s an entire chapter on that.

I didn’t enjoy the chapters on writing support that much, but if you’re looking into setting up a campus-wide (or even faculty-wide) writing support, you’ll get plenty of ideas what may or may not work.

Writing style is explicitly not covered, and I think that’s a good thing. Not that books on good writing were redundant — to the contrary! — but this way we get a focused book that can serve everyone from a first-year PhD student to established faculty.